HARRIS v. SENEX SERVICES CORP.
RHONDA HARRIS |
SENEX SERVICES CORP. |
1:2020cv01676 |
June 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER - The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, any pending motions are denied as moot, and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are vacated. Parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal within 28 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/17/2020.(MGG) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 8/28/2020 03:30 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties themselves may participate at their option. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/22/2020.(SWM) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant SENEX SERVICES CORP.. (Levi, Nicholas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Ward Levi on behalf of Defendant SENEX SERVICES CORP.. (Levi, Nicholas) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by RHONDA HARRIS. SENEX SERVICES CORP. served on 6/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John) |
Filing 5 TRIAL PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SENEX SERVICES CORP. (REO) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff RHONDA HARRIS. (Steinkamp, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against SENEX SERVICES CORP., filed by RHONDA HARRIS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6041407) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The January 14, 2020, letter sent by Plaintiff's Counsel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - Relevant pages of Plaintiff's March 31, 2020, TransUnion credit report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HARRIS v. SENEX SERVICES CORP. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SENEX SERVICES CORP. | |
Represented By: | Nicholas Ward Levi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RHONDA HARRIS | |
Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.