GEORGE v. REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.
BRITTANNI GEORGE |
REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC. |
1:2020cv01702 |
June 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Doris L Pryor |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION to Stay Discovery, filed by Defendant REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Carr, David) |
Filing 11 ORDER Setting Pretrial Schedule and Discussing Discovery. The parties are ORDERED to appear in person, or by counsel if represented, for an initial pretrial conference in this case, on August 21, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. (Eastern). The conference will be held before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor, by telephone. The parties are to call 877-336-1274, Access Code 9785171, Security Code 201702. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 7/31/2020. Mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff.(CAG) |
Filing 10 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Charge)(Carr, David) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Carr, David) |
Filing 8 Submission of State Court Records received from Marion County Clerk Cause No. 49D13-2006-PL-017706. (MAC) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting Defendant's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 7/28/2020. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 6/30/2020. (SWM) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to 07/28/2020 in which to #1 Notice of Removal Answer Complaint, filed by Defendant REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Carr, David) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Carr, David) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Conrad Sweeney on behalf of Defendant REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Sweeney, Paul) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Carr on behalf of Defendant REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Carr, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION from Marion County Superior Court, case number 49D13-2006-PL-017706, filed by REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6044388) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint)(Carr, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: GEORGE v. REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BRITTANNI GEORGE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC. | |
Represented By: | Paul Conrad Sweeney |
Represented By: | David J. Carr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.