HARDISTER v. SAUL
| ELIZABETH HARDISTER |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| 1:2020cv01736 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint to 9/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/19/2020. (MAC)
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to October 23, 2020 , filed by Defendant ANDREW SAUL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration in support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Han, Lu) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Lu Han on behalf of Defendant ANDREW SAUL. (Han, Lu) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, [Dkt. #2 ], is GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/26/2020. (DWH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Local Rule 5-12(a), and by agreement with the United States Attorney, no actual service of initial process is required in Social Security appeals brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, unless otherwise ordered. The Social Security Administration will treat notification through the Court's Case Management and Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF) as service under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Clerk's Office will refrain from issuance of the submitted summons(es) unless otherwise ordered. (TEXT-ENTRY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (REO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Michelle Hess on behalf of Plaintiff ELIZABETH HARDISTER. (Hess, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff ELIZABETH HARDISTER. (Hess, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by ELIZABETH HARDISTER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Hess, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HARDISTER v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW SAUL | |
| Represented By: | Lu Han |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ELIZABETH HARDISTER | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Michelle Hess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
