DANIELS v. COOKE
Case Number: 1:2020cv01752
Filed: March 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 88 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granting 99 Motion for a trial date in due course. After counsel is appointed, the Magistrate Judge is requested to set this matter for a telephonic status c onference to discuss what further development is necessary for trial and if the case is amenable to settlement (SEE ORDER REGARDING CLAIMS). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/12/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Blank Form-Motion for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel) (CBU)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT COOKE AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Because the grievance process was not available to Mr. Daniels, defendant Cooke's motion for summary judgment, dkt. 25 , is denied. Ms. Cooke shall have through March 23, 2021, in which to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint. (SEE ORDER). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/1/2021. (MAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DANIELS v. COOKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?