JONES v. FLOYD et al
| AUDRAIN JONES |
| MICHELLE FLOYD, JOHN DOE and MICHELLE R HASTY |
| 1:2020cv01756 |
| June 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| James R Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JDC) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Northern; Case Number 3:20-cv-00545. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSERRING case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/29/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 6/30/2020.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Audrain Jones. (nae) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 6/30/2020.] |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against John Doe, Michelle Floyd, Michelle R Hasty, filed by Audrain Jones. (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Jones) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nae) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 6/30/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
