PATEL v. PATEL et al
| RAJ PATEL |
| EMORY UNIVERSITY, INC., CHARMI PATEL, MANISHA PATEL, KARTIK PATEL, DHAVAL PATEL, NEAL PATEL, NINA PATEL, DONALD J. TRUMP and AJAY NAIR |
| 1:2020cv01772 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RAJ PATEL re #20 Amended Complaint (JD) |
| Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by RAJ PATEL.(JD) |
Filing 19
ENTRY - SCREENING COMPLAINT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; The sole allegation concerning Ajay Nair is that Patel. Is not enough to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against these defendants. Thus, Patel's action cannot proceed against these proposed defendants. Patel shall have through Friday, August 28, 2020, by which to show cause why judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. *** SEE ENTRY ***. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/4/2020. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
| Filing 18 RECEIPT #IP070178 for filing fee in the amount of $400.00, paid by RAJ PATEL. (DJH) |
| Filing 17 RECEIPT #IP070178 for filing fee in the amount of $400.00, paid by Plaintiff. (DJH) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER denying #14 Motion for Free Access to Pacer. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 7/30/2020. (JRB) Modified text on 7/31/2020 (TMB).
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause re #13 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RAJ PATEL. (NAD) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Free Access to Pacer, filed by Plaintiff RAJ PATEL. (NAD) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. If he elects to proceed with this action he must either pay the $400.00 filing fee by August 7, 2020 as previously ordered or refile his in forma pauperis application and show good cause in writing explaining how both the original and the amended applications are truthful. Failure to take either action, or failure to show good cause if the latter action is chosen, by August 7, 2020 may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 7/23/2020. (JRB)
|
| Filing 12 Third Amended Motion for Redacting Complaint, filed by Plaintiff RAJ PATEL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(JRB) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING WITH LEAVE PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SEAL - Plaintiff's motion (Docket No. 6) does not comply with these procedural requirements and, therefore, his request is DENIED with leave to refile. Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (Docket No. 4), which was an earlier-filed request to seal the Complaint is DENIED as moot. If Plaintiff seeks to refile its motion in accordance with this Local Rule, he should again address the specific information that he seeks to seal, why he believes the information should be sealed, and include a proposed, redacted version of the complaint with all portions he finds confidential blacked out. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-11(g), the Clerk is DIRECTED to unseal the Complaint (Docket No. 1) twenty-one days after this Entry, unless a renewed motion is filed to maintain the document under seal. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 7/14/2020. (JRB) Modified on 7/14/2020 (JRB).
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RAJ PATEL re #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (NAD) |
| Filing 9 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RAJ PATEL. (NAD) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - denying #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court concludes that Patel has not shown that in forma pauperis status is warranted in his case. It appears that Patel has the ability to pay the filing fee required for his civil litigation. He is not a "truly impoverished litigant []" who would "remain without legal remedy if such privilege were not afforded to [him]." Brewster, 461 F.2d at 651. Therefore, the Court DENIES Patel's Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Filing No. #2 ). Patel is ordered to pay the filing fee by Friday, July 31, 2020. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/7/2020. (NAD)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RAJ PATEL re #6 Amended MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint (NAD) |
| Filing 6 Amended MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff RAJ PATEL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(NAD) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RAJ PATEL re #4 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint (NAD) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff RAJ PATEL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(NAD) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RAJ PATEL. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EMORY UNIVERSITY, INC., AJAY NAIR, CHARMI PATEL, DHAVAL PATEL, KARTIK PATEL, MANISHA PATEL, NEAL PATEL, NINA PATEL, DONALD J. TRUMP, filed by RAJ PATEL. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
