KENT v. INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| DELMAR J. KENT |
| INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and THE GEO GROUP INC. |
| 1:2020cv01928 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Entry Dismissing Complaint and Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - The plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed for each of the reasons set forth above. The plaintiff shall have through October 6, 2020, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/14/2020.(NAD)
|
|
Filing 9
Order - Granting Plaintiff's #8 Motion to Reconsider Initial Partial Filing Fee Assessment. Although the records initially presented to the Court suggested that Plaintiff had the ability to pay an initial partial filing fee, the Court credits his current representations in his motion that, in reality, he cannot. The Court therefore finds that Plaintiff does not have the assets or means to pay the initial partial filing fee originally assessed and Plaintiff's motion to reconsider, dkt #8 , is granted. Although Plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. Copy to Plaintiff and CC to Finance. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/14/2020. (NAD)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Reconsider #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DELMAR J. KENT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(NAD) |
|
Filing 7
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #6 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twenty-three Dollars and Thirty-Nine Cents ($23.39) See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through September 15, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/19/2020. (NAD)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DELMAR J. KENT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification of Inmate Trust Fund Account, #2 Envelope)(NAD) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DELMAR J. KENT. (NAD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through August 28, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, THE GEO GROUP INC., filed by DELMAR J. KENT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
