FOSTER v. SAUL
| KENYA M. FOSTER |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 1:2020cv02193 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 12/18/2020 , filed by Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Order (proposed), #2 Appendix declaration)(Tate, Christie) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Christie O'Brien Tate on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Tate, Christie) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY - granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Copy to Office of the U.S. Attorney via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/2/2020. (NAD) |
| Filing 8 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as requested by the Court at Dkt. 6, filed by Plaintiff KENYA M. FOSTER. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Filing No. #2 ), is DENIED. The application does not claim any expenses or financial assistance. Furthermore, the application does not explain the plaintiff's living situation. With no monthly expenses, the checking account balance appears sufficient to pay the filing fee. By the end of the day, October 1, 2020, the plaintiff must either pay the filing fee and administrative fee totaling $400 or submit a second motion more clearly explaining the plaintiff's living situation and purported inability to pay the fee. Copy to Defendant via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/21/2020. (NAD) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph R. Wambach on behalf of Plaintiff KENYA M. FOSTER. (Wambach, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Plaintiff KENYA M. FOSTER. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff KENYA M. FOSTER. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by KENYA M. FOSTER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FOSTER v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL | |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Represented By: | Christie O'Brien Tate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KENYA M. FOSTER | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Frederick Richter |
| Represented By: | Joseph R. Wambach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
