JOHNSON v. SEVIER
| MARK JOHNSON |
| MARK SEVIER |
| 1:2020cv02290 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler G. Banks on behalf of Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Banks, Tyler)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - MARK JOHNSON's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 49G01-1106-PC-41966. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 11/9/2020. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 12/9/2020. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 12/30/2020. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES) (Copy to Petitioner via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/28/2020. (JDC)
|
|
Filing 5
Verified Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner MARK JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JDC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION - On September 2, 2020, Mark Johnson filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his state conviction under Indiana Criminal Case No. 49G01-1106-PC-41966. Mr. Johnson shall have through October 23, 2020, to file an amended petition that sets forth one or more grounds for relief from his state court conviction. Otherwise, his habeas petition will be dismissed without an additional opportunity to show cause. This Order does not affect Mr. Johnson's deadline under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d), and Mr. Johnson should take care to meet that deadline as well (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/17/2020. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (DWH)
|
|
Filing 3
Letter From Petitioner in Support of Claims. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JDC)
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MARK JOHNSON. (Filing fee $5, receipt number IP070535) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. SEVIER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MARK JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MARK SEVIER | |
| Represented By: | Tyler G. Banks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
