PAYNE v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM
Plaintiff: SHANTAE PAYNE
Defendant: DEUTSCHE TELEKOM D/B/A T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DEUTSCHE TELEKOM doing business as T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Case Number: 1:2020cv02297
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2020 Filing 12 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant DEUTSCHE TELEKOM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Christopher Muzio)(Heftman, Lawrence)
October 30, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant DEUTSCHE TELEKOM. (Heftman, Lawrence)
October 30, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, filed by Defendant DEUTSCHE TELEKOM. (Heftman, Lawrence)
October 30, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence H. Heftman on behalf of Defendant DEUTSCHE TELEKOM. (Heftman, Lawrence)
October 30, 2020 Filing 8 ***PLEASE DISREGARD, REFILED AT #10 *** NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, filed by Defendant DEUTSCHE TELEKOM. (Heftman, Lawrence) Modified on 10/30/2020 (JDH).
October 30, 2020 Filing 7 ***PLEASE DISREGARD, REFILED AT #9 *** NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence H. Heftman on behalf of Defendant DEUTSCHE TELEKOM. (Heftman, Lawrence) Modified on 10/30/2020 (JDH).
September 4, 2020 Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH)
September 3, 2020 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
September 3, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DEUTSCHE TELEKOM. (AKH)
September 2, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry Paul Smith on behalf of Plaintiff SHANTAE PAYNE. (Smith, Larry)
September 2, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Marco on behalf of Plaintiff SHANTAE PAYNE. (Marco, David)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against DEUTSCHE TELEKOM D/B/A T-MOBILE USA, INC., filed by SHANTAE PAYNE. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6162400) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Marco, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAYNE v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHANTAE PAYNE
Represented By: Larry Paul Smith
Represented By: David M. Marco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEUTSCHE TELEKOM D/B/A T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEUTSCHE TELEKOM doing business as T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Represented By: Lawrence H. Heftman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?