ABBOTT v. CIRCUIT COURT 3 OF DELAWARE COUNTY et al
| MICHELLE ABBOTT |
| MICHAEL QUIRK, CIRCUIT COURT 3 OF DELAWARE COUNTY and CARL BARBER |
| 1:2020cv02459 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by CARL BARBER. CARL BARBER waiver sent on 10/28/2020. (Paul, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant MICHAEL QUIRK. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion to Dismiss)(Brooke, John) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant MICHAEL QUIRK. (Brooke, John) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Brooke on behalf of Defendant MICHAEL QUIRK. (Brooke, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by William W. Barrett on behalf of Defendant CARL BARBER. (Barrett, William) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Paul on behalf of Defendant CARL BARBER. (Paul, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Findley on behalf of Defendant CIRCUIT COURT 3 OF DELAWARE COUNTY. (Findley, Bryan) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by CIRCUIT COURT 3 OF DELAWARE COUNTY. CIRCUIT COURT 3 OF DELAWARE COUNTY waiver sent on 10/1/2020. (Kirtley, W.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by W. Andrew Kirtley on behalf of Defendant CIRCUIT COURT 3 OF DELAWARE COUNTY. (Kirtley, W.) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MICHELLE ABBOTT. (JDC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk To: (1) Circuit Court 3 of Delaware County, (2) Michael Quirk, and (3) Carl Barber (RAGS) (JDC) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. While in forma pauperis status allows the plaintiff to proceed without pre-payment of the filing fee, the plaintiff remains liable for the full fee. The filing fee for in forma pauperis litigants is $350. See USDC Fee Schedule at https://www.insd.uscourts.gov/fees-financial-information (stating that the $400 filing fee includes a $50 administrative fee, but that fee "does not apply to... persons granted in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. 1915"). Immediate payment is not required, but the $350 balance remains owing. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) requires the Court to order service for Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Clerk is des-ignated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Circuit Court 3 of Delaware County, Michael Quirk, and Carl Barber in the manner specified by Rule 4. Process shall consist of the complaint (ECF No. 1), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/1/2020. (JDC)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHELLE ABBOTT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARL BARBER, CIRCUIT COURT 3 OF DELAWARE COUNTY, MICHAEL QUIRK, filed by MICHELLE ABBOTT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
