SMITH v. SAUL
Plaintiff: EMILY A SMITH
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Case Number: 1:2020cv02585
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that the time in which Defendant may file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint is enlarged to February 5, 2021. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/2/2020. (JDC)
December 1, 2020 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 02/05/2021 in which to #1 Complaint (Unopposed), filed by Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Payne, Lindsay)
October 23, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Beyer Payne on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Payne, Lindsay)
October 22, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/7/2020. (JDC)
October 7, 2020 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
October 7, 2020 (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Local Rule 5-12(a), and by agreement with the United States Attorney, no actual service of initial process is required in Social Security appeals brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, unless otherwise ordered. The Social Security Administration will treat notification through the Court's Case Management and Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF) as service under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Clerk's Office will refrain from issuance of the submitted summons(es) unless otherwise ordered. (TEXT-ENTRY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (AKH)
October 6, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff EMILY A SMITH. (Rutkowski, Annette)
October 6, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Annette Lee Rutkowski on behalf of Plaintiff EMILY A SMITH. (Rutkowski, Annette)
October 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by EMILY A SMITH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons SSA Office to General Counsel, #3 Proposed Summons United States Attorney, #4 Proposed Summons US Attorney General)(Rutkowski, Annette)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Represented By: Lindsay Beyer Payne
Represented By: Julian Clifford Wierenga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMILY A SMITH
Represented By: Annette Lee Rutkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?