HEIDELBERGER v. P.I.P.E., INC. et al
Plaintiff: BLAKE HEIDELBERGER
Defendant: P.I.P.E., INC. and WAYNE PARRISH
Case Number: 1:2020cv02657
Filed: October 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2020 Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by P.I.P.E., INC.. (Smith, Donald)
December 10, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to P.I.P.E., INC.. (RAGS) (NAD)
December 9, 2020 Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by All Defendants.(Smith, Donald)
December 9, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald S. Smith on behalf of Defendants P.I.P.E., INC., WAYNE PARRISH. (Smith, Donald)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 12/30/2020 09:30 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. Section III(A) through (E) of the proposed CMP shall include the following deadlines (see Order for established deadlines and additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/3/2020.(SWM)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting Defendants' #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint 12/16/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/3/2020. (SWM)
November 12, 2020 Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to December 16, 2020 to Answer Complaint, filed by Defendants P.I.P.E., INC., WAYNE PARRISH. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting First Motion for Enlargement of Time)(Money, Randy)
November 12, 2020 Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to December 16, 2020 to Answer Complaint, filed by Defendants P.I.P.E., INC., WAYNE PARRISH. (Money, Randy)
November 12, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Randy Lee Money on behalf of Defendants P.I.P.E., INC., WAYNE PARRISH. (Money, Randy)
November 1, 2020 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on P.I.P.E., Inc. & Wayne Parrish on October 29, 2020, filed by BLAKE HEIDELBERGER. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Service Affidavit)(Weldy, Ronald)
October 26, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to P.I.P.E., INC., WAYNE PARRISH. (NAD)
October 26, 2020 Filing 6 Entry Concerning Selected Matters - The court, having considered the above action and the matters which are pending, makes the following rulings: Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The clerk shall endorse and return the summonses tendered by Plaintiff to counsel for Plaintiff. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for serving process on Defendant. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/26/2020. (NAD)
October 14, 2020 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
October 14, 2020 Filing 4 **PLEASE DISREGARD - DOCKETED IN ERROR** Summons Issued as to P.I.P.E., INC., WAYNE PARRISH. (AKH) Modified on 10/14/2020 (AKH).
October 13, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff BLAKE HEIDELBERGER. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Weldy, Ronald)
October 13, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald E. Weldy on behalf of Plaintiff BLAKE HEIDELBERGER. (Weldy, Ronald)
October 13, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants, filed by BLAKE HEIDELBERGER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Weldy, Ronald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HEIDELBERGER v. P.I.P.E., INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BLAKE HEIDELBERGER
Represented By: Ronald E. Weldy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P.I.P.E., INC.
Represented By: Donald S. Smith
Represented By: Randy Lee Money
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WAYNE PARRISH
Represented By: Donald S. Smith
Represented By: Randy Lee Money
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?