SAMPLE v. THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER et al
| MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE |
| ROB GASKILL, THE INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER and JACOB HILL |
| 1:2020cv02689 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
ENTRY DIRECTING DEVELOPMENT OF EXHAUSTION DEFENSE AND ISSUING PARTIAL STAY - The defendants' exhaustion defense will be resolved pursuant to the following schedule. The defendants shall have through December 22, 2020, in which to either (see Entry). The failure to pursue any of these options by the above deadline constitutes an abandonment of the exhaustion defense (see Entry. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 11/13/2020.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 30
ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by All Defendants.(Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 29
Case transferred in from Evansville Division on 10/15/2020 Case Number 3:20-cv-117. Case assigned to Judge Sarah Evans Barker and Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker., filed by MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 28
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #27 MOTION to Transfer Case to Indianapolis Division , filed by Defendants ROB GASKILL, JACOB HILL. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 27
MOTION to Transfer Case to Indianapolis Division, filed by Defendants ROB GASKILL, JACOB HILL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Transferring Cause to Indianapolis Division)(Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 26
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by JACOB HILL, ROB GASKILL. JACOB HILL waiver sent on 9/10/2020. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 25
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by JACOB HILL, ROB GASKILL. ROB GASKILL waiver sent on 9/10/2020. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 24
DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendants ROB GASKILL, JACOB HILL. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Appearance by Rosemary L. Borek on behalf of Defendants ROB GASKILL, JACOB HILL. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of Appearance by James S. Stephenson on behalf of Defendants ROB GASKILL, JACOB HILL. (Stephenson, James)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER - On August 7, 2020, plaintiff Michael Sample filed a motion requesting the status of his case and a motion for copies. These motions, dkts. #16 and #17 , are granted. The Court has screened the complaint and issued service on the defendants, who have not yet appeared. The clerk is directed to send Mr. Sample a copy of the public docket for this case and a copy of dkt. 1-1. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 9/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Entry #1 , #2 Public Docket Sheet) (JRB)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. SEE ORDER. copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/16/2020.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 19
NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to 1) Rob Gaskill; and 2) Jacob Hill. (JRB)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER SCREENING THE COMPLAINT, DISMISSING DEFICIENT CLAIMS, AND DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS - Mr. Sample's Eighth Amendment claim shall proceed against Jacob Hill in his individual capacity. Mr. Sample's First Amendment retaliation and Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claims shall proceed against Robert Gaskill in his individual capacity. All other claims aredismissed. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Jacob Hill and Rob Gaskill in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. #1 , applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of service of Summons), and this Order. The clerk is directed to terminate Bartholomew Co. Community Correction Center and Indiana Dept. of Corrections as defendants on the docket. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/10/2020.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION Requesting Copies, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION Requesting Status of Case, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
|
|
Filing 15
RECEIPT #IP070101 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $39.57, paid by Plaintiff. (REO)
|
|
Filing 14
Submission of Proposed Summons, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #2 & #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Thirty-Nine Dollars and Fifty-Seven Cents ($39.57). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through August 10, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/9/2020. (AAS)
|
|
Filing 12
Submission of Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
|
|
Filing 11
Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Document(s) re #1 Complaint, filed by Michael Sample. Copy/Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Entry #1 ) (JRB)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
|
|
Filing 9
Docket #5 resent to Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE at WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY based on most recent NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS at Dkt. 7 . (TMC)
|
|
Filing 8
Mail Returned as undeliverable. #5 Notice of Deficiency sent to MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE 134260 Branchville Correctional Facility 21390 Old State Rd. 37 Branchville, IN 47514. Return to sender - offender no longer at this facility. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 7
Address updated for Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE from BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY to Wabash Valley Level 1 Facility based on IDOC website. Dkt. #4 resent to MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE at Wabash Valley Level 1 Facility. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 6
Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE at Branchville Correctional Facility, 21390 Old State Road 37, Branchville, IN 47514. Envelope marked return to sender. (LBT)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through June 24, 2020, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by US Mail. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ROB GASKILL, JACOB HILL, THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER, THE INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, filed by MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
