WILLIAMS v. EZ-MAILING LLC
| QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS |
| EZ-MAILING LLC |
| 1:2020cv02699 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to 1/18/2021 in which to #11 Request for Production of Documents , filed by Defendant EZ-MAILING LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shagley, Richard) |
| Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant EZ-MAILING LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shagley, Richard) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Production of Documents, filed by Plaintiff QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS.(AAS) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EZ-MAILING LLC. (Shagley, Richard) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to EZ-MAILING LLC. (RAGS) (JRB) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. Shagley, II on behalf of Defendant EZ-MAILING LLC. (Shagley, Richard) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by EZ-MAILING LLC. EZ-MAILING LLC waiver sent on 11/5/2020. (Shagley, Richard) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to EZ-MAILING INC. (JRB) |
Filing 5
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING SERVICE - The clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the Complaint (Filing No. 1), applicable forms ((a) Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service and Summons and (b) Waiver of Service of Summons)), and this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/29/2020.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - GRANTED. While in forma pauperis status allows the plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the plaintiff remains liable for the full fees. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/29/2020. (JRB)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EZ-MAILING LLC, filed by QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Page, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Patients Authorization for Disclosure of Health Information)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. EZ-MAILING LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EZ-MAILING LLC | |
| Represented By: | Richard J. Shagley, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
