DELTA FAUCET COMPANY v. KOHLER CO.
| DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation and DELTA FAUCET COMPANY |
| KOHLER CO. |
| 1:2020cv02800 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 MOTION for Attorney(s) Martha Jahn Snyder to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6312828), filed by Defendant KOHLER CO.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Martha Jahn Snyder, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Fleming, Joshua) |
| Filing 21 MOTION for Attorney(s) Kristin Graham Noel to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6312826), filed by Defendant KOHLER CO.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Kristin Graham Noel, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Fleming, Joshua) |
| Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KOHLER CO.. (Fleming, Joshua) |
| Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT in Support of Motion re #17 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer for Improper Venue (Declaration of Felma Degefa), filed by Defendant KOHLER CO.. (Fleming, Joshua) |
| Filing 18 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #17 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer for Improper Venue , filed by Defendant KOHLER CO.. (Fleming, Joshua) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer for Improper Venue, filed by Defendant KOHLER CO.. (Fleming, Joshua) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua B. Fleming on behalf of Defendant KOHLER CO.. (Fleming, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint and Corrected Complaint; Notice of Related Cases; Order Reassigning Related Case and Notice of Reassignment served on Kohler Co. on 11/17/2020, filed by DELTA FAUCET COMPANY. (Moustakas, George) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Michael Patrick Kella for DELTA FAUCET COMPANY added. Copy to Kella via U.S. Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/20/2020. (MAC)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Attorney(s) Michael Patrick Kella to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6277327), filed by Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Certification of Kella, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Swift, Michael) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney George D. Moustakas, Michael P. Doerr, Jewell N. Briggs, Stephanie Lynn Dowdy and David P. Utykanski for DELTA FAUCET COMPANY added. If not already registered with the Court's Electronic Filing System, George D. Moustakas, Michael P. Doerr, Jewell N. Briggs, Stephanie Lynn Dowdy, and David P. Utykanski are ordered to register within ten days of the entry of this order. Copies via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/6/2020. (SWM)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) George D. Moustakas, Michael P. Doerr, Jewell N. Briggs, Stephanie Lynn Dowdy and David P. Utykanski to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $500, receipt number 0756-6262810), filed by Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Certification Briggs, #2 Exhibit A-Certificate of Doerr, #3 Exhibit A-Certification of Dowdy, #4 Exhibit A- Certification of Moustakas, #5 Exhibit A- Certification of Utykanski, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(Swift, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Tanya Walton Pratt and Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Judge Sarah Evans Barker and Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman are no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:20-cv-2800-TWP-MJD, on all future filings in this matter. (DJH) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Clerk is directed to reassign case to Judge Tanya Walton Pratt and Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore for all further proceedings. This case is related to 1:20-cv-02796-TWP-MJD. Judge Sarah Evans Barker and Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/4/2020. (LDH)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Filing in Lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibits (CKM) |
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to KOHLER CO. (REO) |
| Filing 5 Submission of Corrected Complaint, filed by Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation. (Swift, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Cases, filed by Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation (Swift, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation. (Swift, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Swift on behalf of Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation. (Swift, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KOHLER CO., filed by DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6250559) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Kohler store, #2 Exhibit B-'079 patent, #3 Exhibit C-Assignment of Masco, #4 Exhibit C-2 McGuire Assignment, #5 Exhibit C-3 Nelson Assignment, #6 Exhibit D-'702 patent, #7 Exhibit E-Nelson assignment of 16694487, #8 Exhibit F-'217 patent, #9 Exhibit G-Nelson assignment of 16694479, #10 Exhibit H-'079 claim chart, #11 Exhibit I- '702 claim chart, #12 Exhibit J-'217 claim chart, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Proposed Summons)(Swift, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
