RUMPLE v. DEJOY
| ANDREW WARREN RUMPLE |
| LOUIS DEJOY |
| 1:2020cv02907 |
| November 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff ANDREW WARREN RUMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(DWH)
|
|
Filing 8
Documents for service by USM - re #7 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #6 Order on Motion to Appoint CounselOrder on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Electronic notice to USM-C.(DWH)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to LOUIS DEJOY. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Form United States Attorney General, #2 USM 285 Form Office of the United States Attorney, #3 USM 285 Form Postmaster General Louis DeJoy)(DWH)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER - The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the plaintiff a motion for assistance recruiting counsel form with his copy of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process to Defendant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). The Marshal for this District or his Deputy SHALL SERVE the summons, together with a copy of the complaint, dkt. 1, and a copy of this Order, on the defendant and officials designated under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i), at the expense of the United States. Accordingly, Mr. Rumple's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is GRANTED, and his motion requesting appointment of counsel, dkt. #3 , is DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the plaintiff a motion for assistance recruiting counsel form with his copy of this Order. The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk to issue and the U.S. Marshal to serve process on the appropriate parties (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/1/2020. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (Attachments: #1 motion for assistance recruiting counsel form) (DWH)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ANDREW WARREN RUMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH)
|
|
Filing 4
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff, ANDREW WARREN RUMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff, ANDREW WARREN RUMPLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against LOUIS DEJOY filed by ANDREW WARREN RUMPLE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 EEO Investigative Affidavit and Decision, #2 Envelope)(DJH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RUMPLE v. DEJOY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANDREW WARREN RUMPLE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LOUIS DEJOY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
