TAYLOR v. BURESS
ROBERT TAYLOR |
ASHLEY BURESS |
1:2020cv03262 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #7 , is denied because the plaintiff's inmate trust fund account statement reflects that he has sufficient funds to pay the Four Hundred Two Dollar ($402.00) filing fee associated with this civil action. The plaintiff shall have through March 12, 2021, in which to pay the full filing fee to the Clerk of this Court. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action for failure to pay. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/11/2021. (AAS) |
Filing 8 RECEIPT #IP072600 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $30.00, paid by plaintiff. (AKH) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 6 Entry on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff has failed to do so or otherwise respond by the deadline. The plaintiff shall have through March 11, 2021, to comply with the Court's previous order or to explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissalof this action without further warning. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/11/2021.(JRB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 8, 2021, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ROBERT TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASHLEY BURESS, filed by ROBERT TAYLOR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TAYLOR v. BURESS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ASHLEY BURESS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ROBERT TAYLOR | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.