ELMORE v. SNAP-ON INC.
TIMOTHY ELMORE |
SNAP-ON INCORPORATED * and SNAP-ON, INC. doing business as SNAP-ON TOOLS |
1:2021cv00099 |
January 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Beutel on behalf of Plaintiff TIMOTHY ELMORE. (Beutel, Joseph) |
Filing 8 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant SNAP-ON, INC. . (Noorzad, Parwana) |
Filing 7 ANSWER , Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand, filed by Defendant SNAP-ON, INC.. (Noorzad, Parwana) |
|
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE Unopposed Enlargement of Time to Answer Complaint, filed by Defendant SNAP-ON INCORPORATED (Noorzad, Parwana) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SNAP-ON INCORPORATED. (Noorzad, Parwana) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Parwana Noorzad on behalf of Defendant SNAP-ON INCORPORATED. (Noorzad, Parwana) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL to Federal Court filed by SNAP-ON INCORPORATED. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6364871) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - State Court Record (Docket Sheet, Summons, Complaint, Appearance, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Civil Cover Sheet)(Noorzad, Parwana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.