MANCILLAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| RUBEN MANCILLAS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2021cv00119 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the United States' motion for a 60- day extension of time to respond to the Petitioner's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Court, being duly advised in the premises, now GRANTS the motion, dkt. #4 , finding it to be made for good cause. The United States shall have to and including April 27, 2021, to file its response to the 2255 motion. (Copy to Petitioner via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/4/2021. (JDC)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 27, 2021 to respond to the Petitioner's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Linder, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas J. Linder on behalf of Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Linder, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The clerk shall forward a copy of this Order to the United States Attorney for this District. The United States is notified of the filing of the petitioner's motion for relief and memorandum in support pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. The United States shall have until February 26, 2021, in which to answer the allegations of the motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, and the petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) calendar days after service of the answer in which to reply. If the United States' answer refers to briefs, filings, or transcripts of the prior proceedings that are not available in the Court's electronic records, the United States is directed to furnish them along with its answer. See Rule 5(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Any motion for an extension of time to file an answer should include a statement notifying the Court whether and when a request for production of transcripts has been made to the court reporter. Any motion for an extension of time filed by the respondent must include the petitioner's current earliest possible release date. (Coy to Petitioner via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 1/15/2021.(JDC)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by RUBEN MANCILLAS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope).(AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MANCILLAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas J. Linder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RUBEN MANCILLAS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
