TULLIS v. KNIGHT et al
Plaintiff: JEFFREY TULLIS
Defendant: WENDY KNIGHT, FOX and COATES
Case Number: 1:2021cv00168
Filed: January 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - The plaintiff's motion for time, dkt [ #7 ], is granted. The plaintiff shall have through April 8, 2021, in which to pay an initial partial filing fee of Two Dollars and Forty Cents ($2.40) consistent with the Order of February 4, 2021. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/18/2021. (SWM)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY TULLIS. (NAD)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Two Dollars and Forty Cents ($2.40). The plaintiff shall have through March 3, 2021, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. CC to Finance. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/4/2021. (NAD)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JEFFREY TULLIS. (NAD)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY TULLIS. (AKH)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COATES, FOX, WENDY KNIGHT, filed by JEFFREY TULLIS. (No fee paid with this filing).(AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TULLIS v. KNIGHT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WENDY KNIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FOX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY TULLIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?