CORNWELL v. CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC.
STACY L. CORNWELL |
CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC. and CAKE-BAKE, LLC |
1:2021cv00265 |
February 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/29/2021 01:30 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the court's expectations for the conference. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 3/25/2021.(SWM) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC.. (Preston, Scott) |
Filing 10 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC.(RAGS) (CKM) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC.. (Preston, Scott) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Wayne Parker, Jr on behalf of Defendant CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC.. (Parker, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott James Preston on behalf of Defendant CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC.. (Preston, Scott) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC. (CKM) |
Filing 5 RECEIPT #IP072567 for Pro Hac Filing fee in the amount of $100.00, paid by Stacy Cornwell on behalf of Jeffrey Hedges. (AKH) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting Jeffrey L. Hedges' #2 Motion to Appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff STACY L. CORNWELL - This case is before the court on the motion for Jeffrey L. Hedges to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiff (Dkt. #2 ). The motion states, "A check in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) in payment of the administrative fees required to process this motion for admission pro hac vice has been submitted to the Clerk of this Court." To date, however, the payment has not yet been received. Therefore, the court GRANTS Jeffrey L. Hedges leave to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of plaintiff, provided the $100.00 administrative fee is paid by February 16, 2021. The court FURTHER ORDERS that Jeffrey L. Hedges register as a user of the court's electronic case filing system by February 16, 2021. Failure to register could result in the revocation of his admission pro hac vice. Copy to Jeffrey L. Hedges via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 2/2/2021. (SWM) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Jeffrey Hedges to Appear pro hac vice (No fee paid with this filing), filed by Plaintiff STACY L. CORNWELL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(REO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAKE BAKE SHOP, INC., filed by STACY L. CORNWELL. (Filing fee $402, receipt number IP072401) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEO Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - dismissal and notice of rights, #3 Exhibit C - performance review, #4 Exhibit D - 7/19/2020 email, #5 Exhibit E - letter from plaintff re: temrnation, #6 Exhibit F - 6/18/2020 performance review, #7 Exhibit G - 7/31/2020 email to plaintiff from HR, #8 Exhibit List, #9 Proposed Summons, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.