EMPSON v. REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD
| Patricia Empson |
| REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD, REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD and ADIDIAS INDY LLC |
| 1:2021cv00405 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. Parties appeared by counsel on 4/21/2021, for a Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference. Dispositive Motions due by 2/22/2022. Discovery due by 12/22/2021. Counsel shall contact the Magistrate Judge promptly after Plaintiff's deposition to provide an update on settlement and to discuss the timing of a settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/21/2021.(SWM)
|
| Filing 14 Proposed CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant ADIDIAS INDY LLC . (Connor, Emily) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER - granting #11 Joint Motion to Correct Caption ; The the motion and ORDERS that the caption to all pleadings and filings in this matter shall read as indicated above. SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to terminate Reebok International, LTD and substitute adidias Indy LLC as the defendant of record. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/29/2021. (CKM)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/21/2021 10:30 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties themselves may participate at their option. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/26/2021.(SWM)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct Caption, filed by Defendant REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order to Correct Caption)(Connor, Emily) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig M. Borowski on behalf of Defendant REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD. (Borowski, Craig) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD. (Connor, Emily) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD. (Connor, Emily) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily L. Connor on behalf of Defendant REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD. (Connor, Emily) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD. (REO) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to Patricia Empson. (Dilley, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET , filed by Plaintiff Patricia Empson. (Dilley, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Kyle Dilley on behalf of Plaintiff Patricia Empson. (Dilley, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Patricia Empson, filed by Patricia Empson. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6424167) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Dilley, Daniel) Modified on 2/23/2021 (REO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
