MENDOZA v. PARTNER'S AND HOUSING et al
| CHELLCRISE MENDOZA |
| KASLEY CARROLL, MONICA LAMBERT, LAVONTA SMITH and PARTNER'S AND HOUSING |
| 1:2021cv00409 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58 - The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/19/2021.(AKH) |
Filing 8
ENTRY DISMISSING ACTION ANDDIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - In the Entry of March 5, 2021, the Court screened the Complaint and explained that it is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2)(B) because of deficient pleadings (Filing No. #6 ). The Court gave the Plaintiff an opportunity to amend her Complaint no later than April 7, 2021, and show cause why this case should not be dismissed because of a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has failed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the prior Entry (Filing No. 6), this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will be issued under separate order. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/19/2021.(AKH)
|
| Filing 7 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (1:21-cv-409-TWP-MG), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JDad) |
|
Filing 6
ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. Mendoza is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than Wednesday, April 7, 2021. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/5/2021.(NAD)
|
|
Filing 5
ENTRY - GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AS PREMATURE. As stated above, Mendoza's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, without prepaying fees or costs, dkt #2 , is granted. Mendoza's motion for Preliminary Injunction, dkt. #3 , is denied without prejudice as premature. As required, the Complaint in this action will soon be screened. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/26/2021. (NAD)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff CHELLCRISE MENDOZA. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CHELLCRISE MENDOZA. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KASLEY CARROLL, MONICA LAMBERT, PARTNER'S AND HOUSING, LAVONTA SMITH, filed by CHELLCRISE MENDOZA. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
