HALLIGAN v. COUNTY OF BARTHOLOMEW et al
Plaintiff: RYAN T. HALLIGAN
Defendant: BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and COUNTY OF BARTHOLOMEW
Case Number: 1:2021cv00479
Filed: March 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER on In Forma Pauperis Status On March 5, 2021, the Court ordered the plaintiff to renew his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action or to pay the $402.00 filing fee. The plaintiff has failed to do so or otherwise respond by the deadline. The plaintiff shall have through May 10, 2021, to comply with the Court's previous order or explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/13/2021. Copies sent to Plaintiff via US mail.(AKH)
March 5, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through April 5, 2021, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT)
March 3, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
March 2, 2021 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
March 1, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RYAN T. HALLIGAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Free Request: Printout of Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope)(AKH)
March 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF BARTHOLOMEW, filed by RYAN T. HALLIGAN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HALLIGAN v. COUNTY OF BARTHOLOMEW et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF BARTHOLOMEW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RYAN T. HALLIGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?