DAZA v. STATE OF INDIANA
| PETER DAZA |
| STATE OF INDIANA, NINA DANIEL and RUSSELL FOWLER |
| 1:2021cv00615 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by NINA DANIEL, STATE OF INDIANA, RUSSELL FOWLER. NINA DANIEL waiver sent on 3/15/2021; STATE OF INDIANA waiver sent on 3/15/2021; RUSSELL FOWLER waiver sent on 3/15/2021. (Blinn, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Blinn on behalf of Defendants NINA DANIEL, RUSSELL FOWLER, STATE OF INDIANA. (Blinn, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service for Summons Supplied by PETER DAZA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Waiver of Service of Summons) (Darst, Richard) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Darst on behalf of Plaintiff PETER DAZA. (Darst, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE OF INDIANA, filed by PETER DAZA. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6456148) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Darst, Richard) Modified on 3/15/2021 (REO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
