JOHNSON v. PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP et al
| ANTHONY JOHNSON |
| JOHN DOES 1-25, UNITED HOLDING GROUP LLC, PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP and UNITED HOLDING GROUP, LLC |
| 1:2021cv00678 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting Raphael Deutsch's #2 Motion to Appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff ANTHONY JOHNSON. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/23/2021. (SWM)
|
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP, UNITED HOLDING GROUP, LLC. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Raphael Deutsch to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6467280), filed by Plaintiff ANTHONY JOHNSON. (Deutsch, Raphael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES 1-25, PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP, UNITED HOLDING GROUP LLC, filed by ANTHONY JOHNSON. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6467250) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Summons #3 Proposed Summons #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Deutsch, Raphael) Fixed duplicate docket text - Modified on 3/22/2021 (AKH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
