HARTHORNE v. HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.
CANDICE HARTHORNE |
HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. N/K/A KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC. and HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. |
1:2021cv00691 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Doris L Pryor |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 32 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) with Prejudice, as to Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff CANDICE HARTHORNE, filed by HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wiley, Craig) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 28 MOTION to Allow Associate General Counsel to Appear at November 4, 2021 Settlement Conference, filed by Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Substitution of Appearance by Cheyna Galloway replacing Michael C. Mohler on behalf of HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. (Galloway, Cheyna) |
![]() |
Filing 25 Joint MOTION for Protective Order , filed by Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Uniform Stipulated Protective Order)(Wiley, Craig) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 21 MOTION to permit a representative of its insurance carrier to appear telephonically, filed by Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for ins. rep. to appear telephonically)(Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 20 Exhibit List (Preliminary), filed by Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.. (Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 19 Witness List (Preliminary), filed by Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.. (Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 18 Witness List , Preliminary, filed by Plaintiff CANDICE HARTHORNE, Exhibit List , Preliminary, filed by Plaintiff CANDICE HARTHORNE. (Masur, James) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. . (Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC..(Wiley, Craig) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Submission of State Court Records Marion County 49D2102-PL007029 (CKM) |
Filing 7 EXHIBIT re #1 Notice of Removal Ex. 1 - State Court Record by HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC.. (Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Carl Mohler on behalf of Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. N/K/A KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC.. (Mohler, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. N/K/A KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC.. (Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. N/K/A KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC.. (Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig W. Wiley on behalf of Defendant HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. N/K/A KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC.. (Wiley, Craig) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D06-2102-PL-007029, filed by HERMAN & KITTLE PROPERTIES, INC. N/K/A KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC.. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6469863) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Copy of Complaint and Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wiley, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.