EDMONDSON v. BLACK
| STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. |
| TODD BLACK |
| 1:2021cv00753 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court, having this day made its Order directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). COPY SENT TO PLAINTIFF VIA US MAIL. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/5/2021.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 14
Order Denying Motion for Relief, Dismissing Action, and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Mr. Edmondson's motion for relief, dkt. #13 , repeats the allegations against the officer but does not cure the deficiencies discussed in the Court's screening order. Accordingly, his motion, dkt. #13 , is denied, and this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). Final judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/5/2021. (JRB)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Relief, filed by Plaintiff STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 12 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet, filed by Stanley Edmonson Jr.. Copy/Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Public Docket Sheet) (AAS) |
|
Filing 11
Order Reconsidering Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Accordingly, the court reconsiders its denial of his motion and now finds that the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , must be granted. The plaintiff is reminded that he has through April 30, 2021, in which to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/23/2021.(JRB)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE, re #9 Order, From Decatur County Sheriff Submission of Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING TRUST ACCOUNT - Plaintiff Stanley Edmondson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was denied because he failed to provide a copy of his trust account statement for his trust account transactions for the previous six months. Dkt. #5 . Mr. Edmondson's motion for a court order for a copy of his trust account, dkt. [ #8 ], is granted to the extent that the clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Sheriff of Decatur County to facilitate getting Mr. Edmondson a copy of his trust account transactions. Copies via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/15/2021.(SWM) Modified on 4/15/2021 (SWM).
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Trust Account, filed by Defendant TODD BLACK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 5
Order Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as Presented, Screening and Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Further Proceedings - Mr. Edmondson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied as presented. He shall have until April 30, 2021, to renew his motion by submitting a copy of his trust account transactions for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action. Mr. Edmondson's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915A. He shall have through April 30, 2021, in which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action for the foregoing reasons. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/30/2021. (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TODD BLACK, filed by STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: EDMONDSON v. BLACK | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TODD BLACK | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STANLEY ERIC EDMONDSON, JR. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
