CLOSSON v. KOHLHEPP et al
| RILEY L. CLOSSON |
| MOORE, A. KOHLHEPP, HOBGOOD and F. MCQUEEN |
| 1:2021cv00772 |
| March 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - Plaintiff Riley Closson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted, and she was provided through May 20, 2021, to pay her initial partial filing fee of $9.27. Dkts. #5 , #8 . That date has passed without Ms. Closson paying the fee or explaining her inability to do so. Ms. Closson shall have through June 17, 2021, to pay the initial partial filing fee. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of her case for failure to prosecute. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 5/26/2021.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granted in part and denied in part #7 Motion for extension of time to file "the paperwork requested" and the appointment of a public defender. Ms. Closson filed an amended complaint on April 26, 2021. Dkt. #6 . Thus, the Court does not need additional "paperwork." Plaintiff shall have through May 20, 2021, to pay that amount to the clerk of the district court. The motion for the appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff may renew her motion for assistance with recruiting counsel by filling out the form motion that the Court will send to her along with his copy of this Order. The clerk is directed to send Ms. Closson a motion for assistance recruiting counsel form with her copy of this Order (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/28/2021 (Copies mailed per distribution list). (Attachments: #1 Blank Form) (TMC)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Documents and to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff RILEY L. CLOSSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT against HOBGOOD, A. KOHLHEPP, F. MCQUEEN, MOORE, filed by RILEY L. CLOSSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Granting Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Screening and Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint - Ms. Closson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. She shall have through May 3, 2021, to pay an initial partial filing fee of Nine Dollars and Twenty-Seven Cents ($9.27). Ms. Closson's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915A. She shall have through May 3, 2021, in which to file an amended complaint. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action for the foregoing reasons.SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/1/2021. (JRB)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RILEY L. CLOSSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against HOBGOOD, A. KOHLHEPP, F. MCQUEEN, MOORE, filed by RILEY L. CLOSSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope).(AKH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
