BELL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC |
PRESIDENT, JOE BIDEN, CIA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS and YMCA |
1:2021cv00779 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Richard L Young |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MOTION to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiffs THOMAS P. BELL, BELL, THOMAS LLC. (Attachments: #1 USCA Order)(LBT) |
Filing 26 AMENDED COMPLAINT against United States of America, Defendant, filed by BELL, THOMAS LLC, THOMAS P. BELL.(AAS) |
Filing 25 NEW COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BELL, THOMAS LLC, THOMAS P. BELL.(AAS) Modified on 5/18/2021 (AAS). |
Filing 24 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BELL, THOMAS LLC, THOMAS P. BELL.(AAS) |
Filing 23 ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION - The court now STRIKES Thomas Bell's Motion for Judicial Intervention #20 for reasons stated in the court's previous orders. #15 and #22 . Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/10/2021. (JRB) |
Filing 22 ORDER Striking #16 Amended Complaint - SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/10/2021.(JRB) |
Filing 20 ***STRICKEN BY #23 *** MOTION for Default Judgment and Request for Judicial Intervention, filed by Plaintiffs THOMAS P. BELL, BELL, THOMAS LLC. (AAS) Modified on 5/10/2021 (JRB). |
Filing 21 USCA Case Number 21-1807 for #17 Notice of Appeal filed by THOMAS P. BELL. (Attachments: #1 Circuit Rule 3(b) Notice)(LBT) |
Filing 19 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #17 Notice of Appeal. - for Court of Appeals Use Only. (LBT) |
Filing 18 PARTIES' SHORT RECORD re #17 Notice of Appeal - Instructions for Attorneys/Parties attached. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff.) (LBT) |
Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BELL, THOMAS LLC, THOMAS P. BELL.(AAS) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Closed Judgment, #10 Order, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS P. BELL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(LBT) |
Filing 15 ORDER STRIKING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING PENDING MOTIONS - The court now STRIKES Bell's Amended Complaint and DENIES Bell's motions. They are frivolous. The court STRIKES Bell's Amended Complaint Filing No. #14 . The court DENIES Bell's Motion for Voluntary Removal Filing No. #12 and Motion for National Security Filing No. #13 . Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/28/2021. (AAS) |
Filing 14 *** PLEASE DISREGARD - STRICKEN BY DKT. #15 *** AMENDED COMPLAINT against JOE BIDEN, CIA, EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, YMCA, filed by THOMAS P. BELL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) Modified on 4/28/2021 (AAS). |
Filing 13 MOTION for National Security, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS P. BELL. (AAS) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Voluntary Removal from USA, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS P. BELL. (AAS) |
Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Order issued today, the court now enters final judgment against Plaintiffs. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/21/2021.(AAS) |
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND CLOSING CASE - Bell is reminded that the court has the authority to restrict his ability to file actions and to assess fines against him for filing frivolous cases. The court may elect to use this power if Bell does not cease filing frivolous lawsuits. All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. Bell's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and this case is now CLOSED. Final judgment shall enter accordingly. SEE ORDER. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/21/2021.(AAS) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Talk Personally to an Investigator, filed by Plaintiffs THOMAS P. BELL, BELL, THOMAS LLC. (AAS) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Investigation, filed by Plaintiffs THOMAS P. BELL, BELL, THOMAS LLC. (AAS) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Fee Waiver Until Case is Won, filed by Plaintiffs THOMAS P. BELL, BELL, THOMAS LLC. (AAS) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BELL, THOMAS LLC, THOMAS P. BELL.(AAS) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 isGRANTED. While in forma pauperis status allows the plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the plaintiff remains liable for the full fees. Having screened Bell's Complaint, Bell is hereby directed to file an Amended Complaint by May 12, 2021. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/12/2021. (JRB) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Removal out of the USA, filed by Plaintiffs THOMAS P. BELL, BELL, THOMAS LLC. (AKH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiffs THOMAS P. BELL, BELL, THOMAS LLC. (AKH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOE BIDEN, CIA, EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, YMCA, filed by BELL, THOMAS LLC, THOMAS P. BELL. (No fee paid with this filing).(AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.