BELL v. OHIO YOUNGSTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al
| THOMAS PHILLIP BELL |
| GED TRANSCRIPT OFFICE FOR DIPLOMA and OHIO YOUNGSTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS |
| 1:2021cv00908 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - RESTRICTING NEW FILINGS. Pursuant to this Court's inherent authority to prevent the abuse of the legal process, protect the limited resources of the judicial system, and promote the interests of justice, IT IS NOW ORDERED that Thomas Phillip Bell is PROHIBITTED from filing new lawsuits in this Court and from filing any document other than a notice of appeal in any action in which final judgment has issued except as outlined in this Order. (See Order). Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/25/2021.(AKH)
|
|
Filing 10
FINAL JUDGMENT - For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order #9 entered this day, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/25/2021.(AKH)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER - DENYING PENDING MOTION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. The Motion for Innocence Based New Evidence (Filing No. #8 ) is DENIED. The Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Final judgment will now issue DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. In addition, by separate order dated today, the Court will restrict Mr. Bell's future filings in this Court. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/25/2021. (AKH)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Innocence Based on New Evidence, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS PHILLIP BELL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Copy of Ivy Tech Community College Student Badge). (AKH) |
|
Filing 7
ENTRY GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DENYING OTHER PENDING MOTIONS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff's Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Filing No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Speedy Trial (Filing No. #3 ) and Motion for Investigation (Filing No. #4 ) are DENIED. Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than Friday, May 14, 2021. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/22/2021. (AKH)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by THOMAS PHILLIP BELL. (AKH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Investigation, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS PHILLIP BELL. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Speedy Trial, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS PHILLIP BELL. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS PHILLIP BELL. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GED TRANSCRIPT OFFICE FOR DIPLOMA, OHIO YOUNGSTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, filed by THOMAS PHILLIP BELL. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
