ENNIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
| STEVE ENNIS and LINDA L. ENNIS |
| ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON |
| 1:2021cv00939 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mario Garcia |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON. (CKM) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting Thomas O. Plouff's #2 Motion to Appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs LINDA L. ENNIS and STEVE ENNIS. Copy to Thomas O. Plouff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 4/22/2021. (SWM)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to ETHICON, INC., and JOHNSON & JOHNSON. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Thomas O. Plouff to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $$100.00, receipt number IP073543), filed by Plaintiffs LINDA L. ENNIS, STEVE ENNIS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, filed by LINDA L. ENNIS, STEVE ENNIS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number IP073543) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
