HALLIGAN v. MYERS
| RYAN T. HALLIGAN |
| MATT MYERS |
| 1:2021cv01008 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STATE CLAIM. Sheriff Myers' motion to dismiss, dkt. #11 , is granted and Halligan's motion to state facts in support of his claim, dkt. #14 , is granted to the extent that Halligan shall have through July 19, 2021, in which to file an amended complaint or final judgment will be entered. Copy sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Complaint Form) (AKH)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER - The plaintiff's motion for default, dkt. #13 , is denied because the defendant is not in default. The clerk is directed to include a copy of the defendant's brief in support of his motion to dismiss, dkt. #12 , with the plaintiff's copy of this Order. The plaintiff shall have through June 30, 2021, in which to respond to the motion. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/1/2021. (AKH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/1/2021: #1 Defendants Brief in Support) (AKH).
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to State Facts for Claim, filed by Plaintiff RYAN T. HALLIGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Entry of Default, filed by Plaintiff RYAN T. HALLIGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 12
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant MATT MYERS. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant MATT MYERS. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 10
Order - The defendant's motion for ruling on pending state court motion for enlargement of time to respond to the complaint, dkt. #8 , is denied as moot because the Court's April 28, 2021, Order extended the time for the defendant to respond to the complaint to May 21, 2021. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/30/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
|
|
Filing 9
Order Screening Complaint - The plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim against Sheriff Myers shall proceed. All other claims are dismissed. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through May 28, 2021, in which to identify those claims. Defendant shall have through May 21, 2021, in which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/28/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Ruling on Pending State Court Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to the Complaint, filed by Defendant MATT MYERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Motion for Extension of Time, #2 Exhibit State Court Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 6
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by James S. Stephenson on behalf of Defendant MATT MYERS. (Stephenson, James)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF PENDING STATE COURT MOTION, filed by Defendant MATT MYERS (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 3
DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant MATT MYERS. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Rosemary L. Borek on behalf of Defendant MATT MYERS. (Borek, Rosemary)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Bartholomew Superior Court, case number 03D01-2103-PL-1570, filed by MATT MYERS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6527797) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Docket Sheet, Appearance of Plaintiff, Complaint, Affidavit of Indigency, Motion for Fee Waiver, Order, Summons, Order to Appoint Special Judge, Notice to Special Judge, Appearance of James S. Stephenson, Appearance of Rosemary L. Borek, Motion for Enlargement of Time, Proposed Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Jury Demand and Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Borek, Rosemary)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HALLIGAN v. MYERS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MATT MYERS | |
| Represented By: | James S. Stephenson |
| Represented By: | Rosemary L. Borek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RYAN T. HALLIGAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
