JOHNSON v. ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC
| JENNIFER L. JOHNSON |
| ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC |
| 1:2021cv01053 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance , filed by Defendant ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Wheeler, James) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/15/2021 at 4:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 5/26/2021.(CBU)
|
| Filing 6 Submission of State Court Records received from the Marion County Superior Court CAUSE NO. 49D13-2005-PL-017415. (MAC) |
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (MRI) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James Alex Emerson on behalf of Defendant ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC. (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James K. Wheeler on behalf of Defendant ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC. (Wheeler, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court 13, case number 49D13-2005-PL-017415, filed by ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6534432) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record (Complaint, Appearance for Plf, Summons to Def, Appearance, Motion for Extension, Motion to Dismiss, Response in Opposition to Motion, Reply in Support of Motion, Proposed Order to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, Answer to Counterclaim, Answer to Counterclaim (2), Order Issued, Defendant's Response to RFA, Motion for Mediation, Plf's Opposition to Motion, Order for Mediation, ARC Responses to First Interrogatories, Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, Amended Complaint, Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Mtn for Leave to Amend Complaint, Order Granting Motion for Leave, Second Request for Production of Documents, Answer to Amended Complaint and Counterclaim, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wheeler, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ADDICTION REHAB CENTERS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | James Alex Emerson |
| Represented By: | James K. Wheeler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JENNIFER L. JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Jason R. Ramsland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
