FILS-AIME v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
PIERRE-HENRI FILS-AIME |
UNITED POSTAL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. |
1:2021cv01828 |
June 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Ya Li for UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. added. Counsel shall register for electronic filing, as required by Local Rule 5-3, within 7 days. Copy to Ya Li and Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/9/2021. (SWM) |
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.. (Gumbiner, Krysta) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/17/2021 11:00 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Plaintiff shall participate in this conference by calling the Court at 317-229-3660. Defendant shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties shall tender a proposed CMP no less than 3 days prior to the pretrial conference. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/9/2021.(SWM) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Ya Li to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6690763), filed by Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Ya Li, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Gumbiner, Krysta) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (RAGS) (DWH) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed - United Parcel Service, Inc. waiver sent on 6/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(AKH) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. waiver sent on 6/28/2021. (Gumbiner, Krysta) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Krysta Kaye Gumbiner on behalf of Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.. (Gumbiner, Krysta) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 Order sent to PIERRE-HENRI FILS-AIME, 1235 E. 52nd St., Apt. A2, Indianapolis, IN 46205. (DWH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk TO: United Parcel Service, Inc. (DWH) |
Filing 4 ORDER - Mr. Fils-Aime's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Dkt. #2 . The clerk is directed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to issue process to Defendant, United Parcel Service, Inc., in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. 1, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Order.The clerk is directed to update Defendant's name on the docket to: United Parcel Service, Inc. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/25/2021. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (DWH) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff PIERRE-HENRI FILS-AIME. (REO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED POSTAL SERVICE, INC., filed by PIERRE-HENRI FILS-AIME. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.