TAYLOR v. BEST WELD, INC. et al
Plaintiff: NATHAN TAYLOR
Defendant: SHARON D MONTGOMERY and BEST WELD, INC.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01858
Filed: June 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Doris L Pryor
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/29/2021 11:00 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 8/10/2021.(SWM)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting Defendants' #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 9/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 8/3/2021. (SWM)
July 30, 2021 Filing 9 Submission of Proposed Order , re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to September 7, 2021 , filed by Defendants BEST WELD, INC., SHARON D MONTGOMERY. (Austin, Michael)
July 29, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael D. Austin on behalf of Defendants BEST WELD, INC., SHARON D MONTGOMERY. (Austin, Michael)
July 29, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to September 7, 2021 , filed by Defendants BEST WELD, INC., SHARON D MONTGOMERY. (Austin, Michael)
July 12, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Larimer on behalf of Plaintiff NATHAN TAYLOR. (Larimer, Sarah)
June 24, 2021 Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC)
June 23, 2021 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK)
June 23, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BEST WELD, INC., SHARON D MONTGOMERY. (LMK)
June 22, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber K. Boyd on behalf of Plaintiff NATHAN TAYLOR. (Boyd, Amber)
June 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by NATHAN TAYLOR. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6622714) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Boyd, Amber)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAYLOR v. BEST WELD, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHARON D MONTGOMERY
Represented By: Michael D. Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BEST WELD, INC.
Represented By: Michael D. Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATHAN TAYLOR
Represented By: Amber K. Boyd
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Larimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?