MCGEE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
Plaintiff: RANDY MCGEE
Defendant: INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and ALBERTO COLLENTES
Case Number: 1:2021cv01959
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Produce Documents, filed by Plaintiff RANDY MCGEE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
August 5, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Amended Complaint and Opportunity to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff RANDY MCGEE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
July 22, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by RANDY MCGEE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISIMSSING COMPLAINT, AND PROVIDING OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW CAUSE - McGee's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. The complaint is dismissed for the reasons discussed in this Order. McGee shall have through August 16, 2021, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Order should not issue (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/20/2021. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
July 7, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC)
July 6, 2021 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
July 1, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RANDY MCGEE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Resident Account Summary, #2 Envelope)(REO)
July 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALBERTO COLLENTES, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, filed by RANDY MCGEE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCGEE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RANDY MCGEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALBERTO COLLENTES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?