GENTRY v. STATE OF INDIANA
BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY |
STATE OF INDIANA |
1:2021cv02036 |
July 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Richard L Young |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Correspondence from Brandon Gentry, filed by Plaintiff BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY. (JRB) |
Filing 11 MARGINAL ENTRY re #9 Proposed Case Management Plan - This proposed scheduling and case management order is denied. This action is closed based upon a judgment entered July 16, 2021, in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. [Filing No. #5 ]. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/9/2021.(SWM) |
Filing 10 MARGINAL ENTRY re Plaintiff's #8 Motion for Protective Order - Motion denied. This action is closed based upon a judgment entered July 16, 2021, in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. [Filing No. #5 ]. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/9/2021. (SWM) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN, filed by Plaintiff BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY. (JRB) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Protective Order, filed by Plaintiff BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY. (JRB) |
Filing 7 Complaint for Injunctive Relief, filed by Plaintiff BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY. (JRB) |
Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT - Consistent with the screening order issued this date, the court enters final judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/16/2021.(JRB) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND DISMISSING ACTION - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is GRANTED. The filing fee for in forma pauperis litigants is $350. For the reasons discussed above, this action is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE. lawsuits. If Plaintiff receives one more dismissal on screening for failure to state a claim or on similar grounds, the matter of his filing practices will be referred to the Chief Judge for possible sanctions. Judgment consistent with the Order shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/16/2021. (JRB) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY. (DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE OF INDIANA, filed by BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: GENTRY v. STATE OF INDIANA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BRANDON JOSEPH GENTRY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.