THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. GRAY et al
Plaintiff: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant: SAMANTHA GRAY and JENNIFER CELESTE
Case Number: 1:2021cv02081
Filed: July 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney John W. Stapp, IV for SAMANTHA GRAY added. Counsel shall register for electronic filing, as required by Local Rule 5-3, within 7 days. Copy to John W. Stapp, IV via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/30/2021. (SWM)
August 27, 2021 Filing 8 RETURN of Personal Service, filed by THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. JENNIFER CELESTE served on 7/28/2021. (Howard, Kimberly)
August 27, 2021 Filing 7 RETURN of Service, filed by THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. SAMANTHA GRAY served on 8/24/2021. (Howard, Kimberly)
August 26, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Attorney(s) John W. Stapp IV to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $$100, receipt number IP075520), filed by Defendant SAMANTHA GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Envelope)(JRB)
July 22, 2021 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB)
July 22, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to JENNIFER CELESTE and SAMANTHA GRAY. (JRB)
July 21, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA identifying Corporate Parent PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC. for THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.. (Howard, Kimberly)
July 21, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly E. Howard on behalf of Plaintiff THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Howard, Kimberly)
July 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Interpleader against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6666799) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Group Policy, #2 Exhibit B - Divorce Decree, #3 Exhibit C - 10-21-2019 Documents Sent to Prudential, #4 Exhibit D - 10-23-2019 Beneficiary Confirmation Statement, #5 Exhibit E -10-21-2020 Beneficiary Confirmation Statement, #6 Exhibit F - Application for Group Life Claim, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Proposed Summons)(Howard, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. GRAY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Represented By: Kimberly E. Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMANTHA GRAY
Represented By: John W. Stapp, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JENNIFER CELESTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?