SHAW v. AMERICA et al
| DEMETRIUS SHAW |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION |
| 1:2021cv02105 |
| July 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by DEMETRIUS SHAW. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION served on 8/23/2021. (Gray, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT served on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA & FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION on AUGUST 2, 2021, filed by DEMETRIUS SHAW. (Gray, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to USA - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen G. Gray on behalf of Plaintiff DEMETRIUS SHAW. (Gray, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DEMETRIUS SHAW. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6671257) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice Of Seizure, #2 Exhibit Claim Form, #3 Exhibit FBI Acknowledgment Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons Summons 2 Defendants)(Gray, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
