FOSTER v. REAGLE
| BRUCE E. FOSTER |
| DENNIS REAGLE |
| 1:2021cv02158 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRUCE E. FOSTER. (DWH)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Sierra A. Murray on behalf of Respondent DENNIS REAGLE. (Murray, Sierra)
|
|
Filing 5
RECEIPT #IP075268 for Writ of Habeas Corpus fee in the amount of $5, paid by Petitioner. (LMK)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - BRUCE E. FOSTER's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 53C03-1106-MR-000523. Petitioner shall have through September 7, 2021, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his/her financial inability to do so. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by August 18, 2021. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by September 17, 2021. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by October 8, 2021. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/9/2021.(DWH)
|
|
Filing 3
CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by BRUCE E. FOSTER located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by BRUCE E. FOSTER to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DWH)
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by BRUCE E. FOSTER. (No fee paid with this filing) (LMK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FOSTER v. REAGLE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BRUCE E. FOSTER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE | |
| Represented By: | Sierra A. Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
