SHOUP v. MONSANTO COMPANY
STEVEN SHOUP |
MONSANTO COMPANY |
1:2021cv02198 |
August 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Doris L Pryor |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Mathew L. Larsen for MONSANTO COMPANY added. Applicant shall register for electronic filing, as required by Local Rule 5-3, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order. Copy to Mathew L. Larsen via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 10/1/2021. (SWM) |
Filing 12 Monsanto Company's ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by MONSANTO COMPANY.(Christensen, Margaret) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Mathew L. Larsen to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6769463), filed by Defendant MONSANTO COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Mathew Larsen **Duplicate of page 3 of the MOTION**, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Christensen, Margaret) Modified on 9/29/2021 (DWH). |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 11/17/2021 at 10:30 AM (Eastern) before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 9/8/2021.(CBU) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Shaina Wolfe on behalf of Defendant MONSANTO COMPANY. (Wolfe, Shaina) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MONSANTO COMPANY. (Christensen, Margaret) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant MONSANTO COMPANY (Christensen, Margaret) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret M. Christensen on behalf of Defendant MONSANTO COMPANY. (Christensen, Margaret) |
Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MONSANTO COMPANY. (LMK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward M. Smid on behalf of Plaintiff STEVEN SHOUP. (Smid, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MONSANTO COMPANY, filed by STEVEN SHOUP. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6689865) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Smid, Edward) Modified on 8/9/2021 (LMK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SHOUP v. MONSANTO COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: STEVEN SHOUP | |
Represented By: | Edward M. Smid |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MONSANTO COMPANY | |
Represented By: | Margaret M. Christensen |
Represented By: | Mathew L. Larsen |
Represented By: | Shaina Wolfe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.