THOMPSON v. MAJCHROWICZ et al
DOUGLAS THOMPSON |
CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ, AMY BENSEMA and PAUL PORACKY |
1:2021cv02238 |
August 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Plaintiff DOUGLAS THOMPSON. (Attachments: #1 EXHIBITS)(AKH) |
Filing 18 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet, filed by Douglas Thompson. Public Docket Sheet sent to D. Thompson via US mail. (Attachments: #1 Public Docket Sheet) (AKH) |
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by DOUGLAS THOMPSON. AMY BENSEMA waiver sent on 8/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
Filing 16 ORDER to Make Inmate Available - via Telephone. Warden of PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ordered to make DOUGLAS THOMPSON Available - via Telephone for court proceeding on 11/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 9/9/2021.(CBU) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 11/2/2021 at 10:00 AM (Eastern) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The parties shall attend the conference by using the following call-in information: 866-434-5269, Access Code 1040400, Security Code 212238. Plaintiff shall appear by telephone. An order to make inmate available shall be entered by separate order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 9/9/2021.(CBU) |
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - Plaintiff Douglas Thompson's pro se Motion for Preliminary Injunction, dkt. #4 , is denied. "A party seeking a preliminary injunction must satisfy all three requirements in the threshold phase by showing that (1) it will suffer irreparable harm in the period before the resolution of its claim; (2) traditional legal remedies are inadequate; and (3) there is some likelihood of success on the merits of the claim." HH-Indianapolis, LLC v. Consol. City of Indianapolis and County of Marion, Indiana, 889 F.3d 432, 437 (7th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation omitted). Mr. Thompson has failed to satisfy any of the requirements for preliminary injunctive relief under Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, his Motion, Dkt. #4 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/8/2021. (AKH) |
Filing 13 RETURN of Service, CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ served on 8/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
Filing 12 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendants AMY BENSEMA, CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ, PAUL PORACKY. (Attachments: #1 Ct of Appeals Decision, #2 Order of Judgment, #3 Qualified Dom Rel Order, #4 Notice of Small Claim, #5 Motion for Change of Judge, #6 Motion to Req Leave to Modify, #7 Order, #8 Mtn for Leave to File, #9 Order Denying)(Poracky, Paul) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendants AMY BENSEMA, CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ, PAUL PORACKY. (Poracky, Paul) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Bernard Poracky on behalf of Defendants AMY BENSEMA, CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ, PAUL PORACKY. (Poracky, Paul) |
Filing 9 ORDER - This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Douglas Thompson's Motion to Enter Objection (Dkt. #8 ). The motion is GRANTED to the extent the Court notes Plaintiff does not consent to referral of this civil action to the assigned magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/31/2021. (AKH) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Enter Objection to Consent to Magistrate Judge, filed by Plaintiff DOUGLAS THOMPSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(TMC) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to: 1) AMY BENSEMA, 2) PAUL PORACKY, 3) CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ. (AKH) |
Filing 6 ENTRY GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISCUSSING ACTION, AND DIRECTING SERVICE - This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's "Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee" (Filing No. #3 ) and for screening. Plaintiff's "Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee" (Filing No. #3 ) is GRANTED. The filing fee for in forma pauperis litigants is $350.00. No payment is due currently; however, the $350.00 balance remains owing. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) requires the Court to order service for Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Clerk is designated pursuant to issue process to Defendants Cheryl Majchrowicz, Amy Bensema, and Paul Poracky in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the Complaint (Filing No. #2 ; Filing No. 2-1), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (See Entry). Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/17/2021. (AKH) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff, DOUGLAS THOMPSON. (DJH) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, DOUGLAS THOMPSON. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Prisoner Account, Transaction History Inquiry)(DJH) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against AMY BENSEMA, CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ, and PAUL PORACKY, filed by DOUGLAS THOMPSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including court records, implementation plan, and US Code information)(DJH) |
Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by DOUGLAS THOMPSON located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by DOUGLAS THOMPSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.