TAYLOR v. INDIANAPOLIS POST OFFICE et al
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR |
INDIANAPOLIS POST OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, WOLFE, SAMUELSON and PORTER |
1:2021cv02266 |
August 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account Information). (MAC) |
|
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR. (MAC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through September 20, 2021, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, INDIANAPOLIS POST OFFICE, PORTER, SAMUELSON, WOLFE, filed by EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.