JOHNSON v. ROHANDA et al
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON |
DOCTOR ROHANDA, WELLPATH, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and THE JAIL COMMANDER |
1:2021cv02284 |
August 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet, filed by Christopher Johnson. Copy/Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP076075 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $2.33, paid by Plaintiff. (REO) |
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(LMK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAIL COMMANDER, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROHANDA, WELLPATH, filed by CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.