NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC. v. BIBAS
NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC. |
MOHAMED A BIBAS and MOHAMED AHMED BIBAS |
1:2021cv02352 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance. Attorney George M. Plews; Nicholas James Bognanno and Colin Edington Connor withdrawn.The Clerk is directed to update Defendant's contact information on the docket consistent with the distribution of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 10/26/2021 Copy sent to Mr. Bibas via US Mail (CBU) |
Filing 13 CLOSED DISMISSED - The Plaintiff, NextGear Capital, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), and the defendant, Mohamed Ahmed Bibas (the "Defendant"), each by their respective counsel, having filed their Joint Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the Court having reviewed such Stipulation and being otherwise duly advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint against the Defendant is hereby dismissed WITH prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs #12 . Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/19/2021. (MAC) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Plaintiff NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gibson, Michael) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order to Withdraw Appearance by MOHAMED AHMED BIBAS (Bognanno, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance , filed by Defendant MOHAMED AHMED BIBAS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Bognanno, Nicholas) |
Filing 9 ORDER - The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are VACATED. IT IS ORDERED that within sixty days of this date, counsel for the parties shall file a motion to dismiss this cause or a stipulation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/8/2021.(SWM) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to 10/22/2021 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant MOHAMED AHMED BIBAS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Bognanno, Nicholas) |
Filing 7 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (MAC) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by George M. Plews on behalf of Defendant MOHAMED A BIBAS. (Plews, George) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas James Bognanno on behalf of Defendant MOHAMED A BIBAS. (Bognanno, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Colin Edington Connor on behalf of Defendant MOHAMED A BIBAS. (Connor, Colin) |
Filing 2 NOTICE , filed by Defendant MOHAMED A BIBAS (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to Plaintiff of Defendant's Notice of Removal) (Connor, Colin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton Superior Court, case number 29D03-2107-PL-004994, filed by MOHAMED A BIBAS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6722705) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Business Entity Report, #3 Exhibit C - Plaintiff's Appearance, #4 Exhibit D - Notice to Plaintiff of Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit E - Civil Cover Sheet)(Connor, Colin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.