KEMPER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
| GERALD KEMP and GERALD KEMPER |
| ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, BRANDON MILLER, DEBRA HALL, TODD SHIEFEL and JENNIFER RHINEHART |
| 1:2021cv02377 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
FINAL ORDER TO FILE INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT - On September 17, 2021, the Court ordered the plaintiff to support his motion to for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a statement of his inmate trust account transactions for the previous six months. See dkt. 7. The October 18, 2021 deadline to file this information has passed without action by the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have through November 10, 2021, to file his inmate trust account statement as previously directed. His failure to do so in the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning or opportunity to show cause. The clerk is directed to include a copy of dkt. #7 with the plaintiff's copy of this Order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 copy of dkt 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY)(DWH)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CORRECT SPELLING OF PLAINTIFF'S NAME - The plaintiff's motion at Docket No. [ #8 ] is GRANTED to the extent that the clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that the plaintiff's surname is "Kemper." Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/14/2021. (SWM)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Court Assistance re: Correct Name, filed by Plaintiff GERALD KEMP. (MAC) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through October 18, 2021, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (JRT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #2 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff GERALD KEMP. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff GERALD KEMP. (REO) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, DEBRA HALL, BRANDON MILLER, JENNIFER RHINEHART, TODD SHIEFEL, filed by GERALD KEMP. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by GERALD KEMP located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by GERALD KEMP to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
