INGRAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| KEVIN INGRAM and BOOSTER |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2021cv02479 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the United States's motion for a 45-day extension of time to respond to the Petitioner's motion. The Court, being duly advised in the premises, now GRANTS the motion, dkt. #4 , finding it to be made for good cause. The United States shall have to and including December 20, 2021, to file its response to the 2255 motion. (See Order). Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/25/2021. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Extension of Time to December 20, 2021 to respond to #1 the Petitioner's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Linder, Nicholas) Modified on 10/21/2021 (AKH).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas J. Linder on behalf of Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Linder, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - This matter is before the Court on Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed on September 20, 2021 by the Petitioner Kevin Ingram. (Dkt. 1). The United States of America is Ordered to Show Cause as follows. 1. The clerk shall forward a copy of this Entry to the United States Attorney for this District. The United States is notified of the filing of the petitioner's motion for relief and memorandum in support pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. 2. The United States shall have until November 5, 2021, in which to answer the allegations of the motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, and the petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) calendar days after service of the answer in which to reply. 3. If the United States' answer refers to briefs, filings, or transcripts of the prior proceedings that are not available in the Court's electronic records, the United States is directed to furnish them along with its answer. See Rule 5(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Any motion for an extension of time to file an answer should include a statement notifying the Court whether and when a request for production of transcripts has been made to the court reporter. 4. Any motion for an extension of time filed by the respondent must include the petitioner's current earliest possible release date. (Copy to Petitioner via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/24/2021.(JDC)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by KEVIN INGRAM. (Attachments: #1 Petition to Vacate, Remand, and Correct Sentence 28 U.S.C. 2255, #2 Exhibit A -- pages from transcript, #3 Exhibit B -- pages from transcript, #4 Exhibit C -- docket entries, #5 Exhibit D -- transcript page, #6 Exhibit E -- transcript page, #7 Exhibit F -- Personal And Family Data, and criminal history details 2001-2016, #8 Exhibit G -- data including Physical Condition, Mental And Emotional Health, #9 Exhibit H -- Mental And Emotional Health, Subtance Abuse; Educational, Vocational, And Special Skills, #10 Exhibit I -- criminal history details 2012-2016, #11 Exhibit J -- criminal history details 2016-2017, #12 Envelope)(DJH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
