KNOX v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
| RONALD KNOX |
| MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA |
| 1:2021cv02489 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff RONALD KNOX and Defendants. (Thompson, David) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND DISCUSSING DISCOVERY IN PRISONER LITIGATION: This Order sets the schedule for how this action shall proceed. Part I sets forth the pretrial deadlines. Part II discusses various aspects of discovery. Facilitating the discovery process can be difficult, and this Order is issued in an effort to help explain and streamline the process for the parties. The parties should carefully read this Order. *SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*. Dispositive Motions due by 6/2/2022. Discovery due by 5/2/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 11/2/2021.(CBU)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , filed by All Defendants.(Forbes, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties First Extension of Time filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE (Forbes, Katherine) Modified on 9/29/2021 (JDC). |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 11/22/2021 at 11:00 AM (Eastern) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 9/24/2021.(CBU)
|
| Filing 5 Submission of State Court Record from Marion County in case number 49D07-2105-CT-017183. (JDC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Regarding State Court Motions, filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE (Forbes, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Marie Forbes on behalf of Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. (Forbes, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D07-2105-CT-017183, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6759160) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record Docket Report, Complaint, Appearance, Summons to Defendant, Jury Trial Demand, Cert. of Service, Appearance for MCSO, Notice of Automatic Extension of Time, Green Card signed, Answer to Complaint, Motion for Leave to Amend, Summons to City (Corporation Counsel), Summons to City (Mayor), Summons to Consolidated City (Corporation Counsel), Summons to Consolidated City (Mayor), Summons to Marion County (Corporation Counsel), Summons to Marion County (City-Council President), Defendants' Notice to Court Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, Order Granting Motion for Leave to Amend, #3 State Court Record Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(Forbes, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
